Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(4)2023 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2295544

ABSTRACT

A woman in her 30s was referred to an otolaryngologist with an acute onset of aural fullness, noise sensitivity, unilateral sudden onset hearing loss, vertigo and tinnitus. She had a confirmed COVID-19 infection 5 weeks prior. A pure tone audiogram confirmed sensorineural hearing loss. MRI identified an empty sella of the pituitary gland and without an obvious cause for hearing loss. Oral prednisolone and betahistine were prescribed, and her audiovestibular symptoms slowly improved over the subsequent months. The patient continues to experience intermittent tinnitus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Tinnitus , Female , Humans , Tinnitus/drug therapy , Tinnitus/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/drug therapy , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/drug therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Vertigo
3.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(4): 103859, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266602

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether exposure to intrauterine COVID-19 infection causes congenital or late-onset hearing loss in infants. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The hearing screening results of infants born in a tertiary hospital between March 2020 and April 2022 with and without a history of intrauterine exposure to COVID-19 infection (36 infants each) were retrospectively analyzed within one month after birth in all infants and additionally at six months after intrauterine COVID-19 infection exposure in the study group. The automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test was used for the hearing evaluation. RESULTS: The polymerase chain reaction test was negative in study group exposed to intrauterine COVID-19 infection. The number of infants admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and the length of ICU stay were significantly higher in this group (p < 0.01). Six infants (16.6 %) in the study group failed the first AABR test bilaterally, but five of these infants passed the second AABR test. A bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss was detected in one infant (2.77 %). All the infants in the study group underwent the AABR test again at six months, and all infants, except this infant, passed the test. In the control group, five infants (13.88 %) failed the first AABR test bilaterally, but they all passed the second test. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to COVID-19 infection in the intrauterine period does not cause congenital or late-onset hearing loss (within six months) in infants; therefore, gestational COVID-19 infection is not a risk factor for infant hearing loss.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Neonatal Screening/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Tests/methods , Risk Factors
4.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(8): 3609-3613, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259269

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Previous data demonstrated an increased incidence of Idiopathic Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL) in 2021 compared to 2019-2020, suggesting an association with the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. We aimed to assess our center's incidence and compare the clinical manifestations and outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with ISSNHL during 2021 was conducted and compared to patients who presented in 2018-2020. Patient demographics, audiometry features, vaccination status, and prognosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Throughout 2021, 51 patients were diagnosed with ISSNHL, compared with 31 during 2020, 38 in 2019, and 41 in 2018, demonstrating a 64%, 34%, and 24% increase, respectively. Among patients who presented in 2021, 13 (25.4%) received the anti-COVID-19 vaccine within 30 days before their presentation, and 4 received it within 96 h. Most presented after receiving the second or third dose. Patient characteristics, audiometry features, and prognosis did not significantly differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSIONS: A marked incline was seen in the 2021 ISSNHL incidence at our medical center, of which 25% of cases were within a month post-anti-COVID-19 vaccination. No significant difference was found in clinical manifestations and outcomes between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients. While other justifications could be sought, an association cannot be ruled out, and further research is needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Vaccines , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Prognosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology
5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103725, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Anecdotal reports of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) following COVID-19 vaccination have emerged in the otolaryngology community. Studies have demonstrated no association between COVID-19 vaccination and SSNHL. We aim to characterize the spectrum of otologic symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients seen in the otology clinic at an academic center was performed. Patients completed a questionnaire on the development of new otologic symptoms within 4 weeks of COVID-19 vaccination. Diagnostic and audiometric data was collected retrospectively for patients reporting otologic symptoms. RESULTS: Between May and July 2021, 500 patients were screened. Median age was 56.6 years old, with 59.4 % female and 40.2 % male. 420 patients (84.0 %) were vaccinated, with 58.4 % receiving Pfizer, 29.1 % receiving Moderna, and 3.8 % receiving Johnson & Johnson. 61 patients (14.5 %) reported one or more otologic symptoms within 4 weeks of vaccination, including 21 (5.0 %) with hearing loss, 26 (6.2 %) with tinnitus, 33 (7.9 %) with dizziness, and 19 (4.5 %) with vertigo. Of the 16 patients (3.2 %) reporting tinnitus with no associated hearing loss, 8 were diagnosed with subjective tinnitus and 4 were diagnosed with temporomandibular joint syndrome. Of the 18 patients reporting hearing loss, 11 had exacerbations of underlying pathologies (e.g. Meniere's disease, presbycusis) and 7 were newly diagnosed with SSNHL (1.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: Patients reporting otologic symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination received various diagnoses of uncertain etiology. The incidence of SSNHL in these patients is comparable to the general otology patient population. Additional studies are required to determine the incidence of specific diagnoses following vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Tinnitus , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Tinnitus/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Vertigo/complications , Vaccination/adverse effects
6.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 149(2): 133-140, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233790

ABSTRACT

Importance: Spontaneous adverse reaction reports of sudden hearing loss have been observed, and a population-based cohort study conducted in Israel showed an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) following vaccination with messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). However, in this setting, the possibility of confounding remained. Objective: To assess a potential association between COVID-19 vaccinations and SSNHL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This register-based country-wide retrospective cohort study of 5.5 million Finnish residents was conducted from January 1, 2019, to April 20, 2022, and included all individuals who were identified from the population information system who were alive or born during the study period except individuals who had SSNHL during 2015 to 2018 according to specialized care derived diagnosis codes for SSNHL (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] code H91.2) as a primary or secondary diagnosis. Exposures: The a priori primary risk period was 0 to 54 days following each COVID-19 vaccination. The risk periods for different vaccine doses did not overlap so that a later vaccine exposure ended the previous risk period. The secondary risk period was from 55 days following each COVID-19 vaccination until a subsequent COVID-19 vaccination. A secondary analysis included a risk time from 0 to 54 days following a positive polymerase chain reaction test result for SARS-CoV-2. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidences of SSNHL following COVID-19 vaccination were compared with the incidences before the COVID-19 epidemic in Finland. The Poisson regression model included calendar time, age, sex, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, other chronic diseases, and the number of visits in primary health care. Results: For the 5.5 million Finnish residents included in the study, the comparison time comprised 6.5 million person-years, the primary risk time of 1.7 million person-years, and the secondary risk time of 2.1 million person-years. Before the COVID-19 epidemic in Finland, 18.7/100 000 people received a diagnosis of SSNHL annually. The study data suggested no increased risk for SSNHL following any COVID-19 vaccination. In particular, adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the BNT162b2 vaccine's 3 doses were 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6-1.0), 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2), and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4), respectively. There was no association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and an increased incidence of SSNHL. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study show no evidence of an increased risk of SSNHL following COVID-19 vaccination. The study accounted for previous disease and other potential confounding factors. These results are based on diagnosis codes in specialized care but still need to be verified in settings that are capable of evaluating the degree of hearing loss.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/complications , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
7.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(2): 126-133, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There have been reports and studies indicating audiovestibular disturbances in COVID-19 patients with variations in the percentage of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of newly diagnosed SNHL, sudden idiopathic hearing loss (SIHL), tinnitus, and vestibular disturbances between infected and uninfected patients, as well as to identify population groups at risk. METHODS: This study used TriNetX to obtain statistics on COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) patients from 61 healthcare organizations. Propensity score with 1:1 matching was used to control confounding variables. This study evaluated the relative risk of developing audiovestibular disturbances up to 1 month after a COVID-19 test and further investigated the incidence in COVID-19 (+) subset groups. RESULTS: Between COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) patients who had an audiogram, there was no statistically significant difference in SNHL or SIHL (SNHL: relative risk [RR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-1.04; SIHL: RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.42-2.40). Race/ethnicity or specified comorbidity did not affect the incidence of SNHL or SIHL. There was a statistically significant difference in tinnitus and vestibular disturbances between the COVID-19 (+) and the COVID-19 (-) groups (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.01-1.66; RR = 2.33, 95% CI = 2.19-2.48). CONCLUSION: New onset hearing loss is not more common in patients with a positive COVID-19 test than those with a negative COVID-19 test. Audiologic evaluation is needed to verify reported hearing disturbances. Although statistically significant in specific population groups, tinnitus and vestibular disturbances may not be clinically significant due to the low incidence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Tinnitus , Humans , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/epidemiology , Tinnitus/etiology , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/complications , COVID-19/complications , Vertigo/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/complications , Hearing
8.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(2): e68-e72, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190966

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) incidence rates over the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign periods to pre-COVID-19 periods. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Secondary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients >12 years with auditory-confirmed SSNHL were enrolled. COVID-19 status and BNT162 inoculation records ≤28 days before SSNHL diagnosis were retrieved. Patients were categorized according to their date of presentation over four equal periods: 1) July 2018-April 2019 (first prepandemic period), 2) May 2019-February 2020 (second prepandemic period), 3) March 2020-December 2020 (COVID-19 outbreak), and 4) January 2021-October 2021 (BNT162b2 vaccinations campaign). INTERVENTIONS: Pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence; BNT162b2 vaccine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to compare SSNHL cases during the COVID-19 and vaccination periods with pre-COVID-19 periods. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients with SSNHL over the four periods, 1 had COVID-19 and 8 were vaccinated. The annual SSNHL incidence was 12.87, 12.28, 13.45, and 19.89 per 100,000 over periods 1 to 4, respectively. SSNHL incidence over the third period was not significantly different than the first/second periods (IRR = 1.045, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.629-1.85, ρ = 0.788, and IRR = 1.095, 95% CI = 0.651-1.936, ρ = 0.683, respectively), whereas SSNHL incidence rate over the fourth period was higher (IRR = 1.545, 95% CI = 0.967-2.607, ρ = 0.068, and IRR = 1.619, 95% CI = 1-2.73, ρ = 0.05, respectively). SSNHL incidence in vaccine recipients was lower than prepandemic unvaccinated patients (IRR = 0.584, 95% CI =0.464-1.67, ρ = 0.984, and IRR = 0.612, 95% CI =0.48-1.744, ρ = 0.92, respectively). CONCLUSION: There were fewer SSNHL cases during the first COVID-19 months. Although the SSNHL rate over the COVID-19 vaccination campaign increased, it was not higher for patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Vaccines
9.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(9)2022 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019955

ABSTRACT

Hearing loss following COVID-19 infection has been scarcely reported in the literature.A previously well middle-aged man presented to the emergency department with breathlessness and cough 8 days after testing positive for COVID-19 in the community. The patient was treated in the intensive care unit due to respiratory failure. Following extubation and step down to ward-level care 2 months later, the patient reported sudden left-sided hearing loss and tinnitus. Ear examination was unremarkable and pure tone audiometry revealed profound left sensorineural hearing loss. MRI of the internal acoustic meatus did not show any cerebellopontine lesions. Intravenous steroid therapy as well as oral steroids were not successful in improvement of hearing.A few cases of COVID-19-associated sensorineural hearing loss have been reported; the majority report irreversible loss. Awareness of this phenomenon and early referral for specialist review and audiological assessment to attempt salvage of hearing can reduce hearing disability.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Steroids
10.
J Laryngol Otol ; 136(9): 823-826, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1947123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if otolaryngologists and audiologists of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery have noticed an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed for the purpose of providing a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of perceived association between the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Of respondents, 63.0 per cent did not notice an increase in sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There was a weak positive correlation between patients identified with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and the percentage of coronavirus disease 2019 positive patients reported by each medical care provider (Spearman correlation = 0.20, 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.05-0.33). There was no association between geographical location and perceived increase in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents did not perceive an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the coronavirus pandemic, regardless of geographical region.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Humans , Pandemics
11.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 148(4): 299-306, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1699454

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Identification of adverse events after vaccination increases awareness of vaccine-associated complications, leading to early diagnosis and treatment. Evidence remains scarce on the association between the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) and sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and SSNHL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study was performed from December 20, 2020, to May 31, 2021, using data from the largest health care organization in Israel. Patients 16 years or older who received the first vaccine dose between December 20, 2020, and April 30, 2021, and the second vaccine dose between January 10, 2021, and April 30, 2021, were included. EXPOSURES: Receipt of first and second BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was SSNHL based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes in conjunction with concurrent prednisone dispensing. Observed cases of SSNHL, occurring within 21 days after each of the first and second vaccine doses, were compared with the expected cases based on the experience of the population in 2018 and 2019. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and attributable risks were computed. RESULTS: Overall, 2 602 557 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.8 [19.6] years; 51.5% female) received the first dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, with 91 cases of SSNHL reported. Of these patients, 2 441 719 (93.8%) received the second vaccine dose, with 79 cases of SSNHL reported. The age- and sex-weighted SIRs were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.09-1.65) after the first vaccine dose and 1.23 (95% CI, 0.98-1.53) after the second vaccine dose. After the first vaccine dose, the estimated SIRs were more pronounced in female patients aged 16 to 44 years (SIR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.98-3.43) and female patients 65 years or older (SIR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.37). After the second vaccine dose, the highest estimated SIR was observed in male patients 16 to 44 years (SIR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.36-4.07). The attributable risks were generally small, and the results were similar when 2019 was used as a reference to estimate the expected number of SSNHL cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine might be associated with increased risk of SSNHL; however, the effect size is very small. Further studies are warranted to establish this possible association.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger , Retrospective Studies
12.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 142(2): 220-223, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1655776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of idiopathic facial nerve palsy (Bell's palsy, BP) and sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) are not known. It has been proposed that common respiratory tract viruses play a part in the pathophysiology of these diseases. OBJECTIVES: The incidence of many infectious diseases decreased during the lockdown of the society that took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated a possible change in the incidence of BP and SSNHL during the lock-down. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched the patient records for all BP and SSNHL cases between 1 Jan 2017 - 31 Aug 2020 at the hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa that covers a population of about 1.2 million. RESULTS: The mean monthly incidence on BP decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic lock-down. No change in the SSNHL incidence was discovered. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: There is reason to speculate that one aetiologic reason for BP are transmittable respiratory tract pathogens.


Subject(s)
Bell Palsy , COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Bell Palsy/epidemiology , Bell Palsy/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , Physical Distancing
13.
Int J Infect Dis ; 113: 341-343, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1525813

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly and was declared a pandemic. In this situation, vaccination for COVID-19 is important and has been prompted in many countries. Rare serious adverse events including Guillain-Barré syndrome, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccinations have been reported. Otolaryngologic adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination were reported, including several cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We report three patients with SSNHL within three days after COVID-19 vaccination and consider an association between them. Although there is no evidence of an association between vaccination and SSNHL, the adverse event of SSNHL after COVID-19 vaccination should be kept in mind because viral infection could be the etiology of SSNHL, which is an otologic emergency that requires prompt treatment with steroids.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , COVID-19 Vaccines , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
15.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(7): 3435-3438, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1446158

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Gestational SARS-Cov-2 infection can impact maternal and neonatal health. The virus has also been reported of causing sensorineural hearing loss. The objective of this study was to determine the possible effect of maternal SARS-COV-2 infection on neonatal hearing as identified during universal hearing screening. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in two tertiary referral centers including all neonates born from November 2020 through April 1st, 2021 and undergoing the universal hearing screening program. Maternal Covid-19 infection was recorded (timing and severity) and the results of hearing screening of their neonates compared to the incidence of neonatal hearing loss results of the national universal screening program during the same period. RESULTS: A total of 984 neonates were included (508 males and 476 females). Sixty-three neonates were excluded due to comorbidities which could cause hearing loss. The incidence of failed responses in the community at large was 2.3%. Twenty-seven failed both steps of screening (2.9%; p < 0.2). There were 34 Covid-19 positive mothers (17 in the first trimester, 8 in the second and 9 in the third). Twenty-nine neonates failed the first screening (p < 0.00001) but on further testing only one neonate failed (2.9%). CONCLUSION: In this study, neonates born to Covid-19 positive mothers do not seem to have an increased risk of hearing loss. However longer follow-up of these neonates is mandatory to detect any possible delayed effects of the virus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatal Screening , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
16.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(8)2021 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373952

ABSTRACT

We present a case of a 7-year-old Afro-Caribbean girl presenting with rapidly progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. She was found to have an elevated Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and mediastinal lymphadenopathy containing non-caseating granulomas with multinucleate giant cells, in keeping with sarcoidosis. Cranial imaging demonstrated labyrinthitis. She underwent urgent bilateral cochlear implantation with rehabilitation of hearing sufficient to restart education within 1 month.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Labyrinthitis , Sarcoidosis , Child , Female , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Humans , Sarcoidosis/complications , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis
17.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(5): 2363-2372, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300469

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine if there is a potential link between COVID-19 infection and hearing loss. METHODS: The prospective study was conducted in the COVID Hospital Clinical Centre Nis, Serbia. We performed tonal audiometry and used a custom questionnaire and medical histories to determine the incidence of hearing loss in COVID-19 positive patients. RESULTS: There were 74 patients with COVID-19 that met the inclusion criteria of this study and they composed our experimental group. Fifty-four (73%) were men and 20 (27%) women. There were 30 (40.5%) patients with hearing loss. Seventeen patients had unilateral and 13 had bilateral hearing loss. Significant differences between hearing loss groups and control group were found across all age groups, but not at all frequencies. No important differences were found when unilateral hearing loss and bilateral hearing loss groups were compared. There were no significant differences in distributions of comorbidities between the patients with hearing loss and normal hearing patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found that 30 (40.5%) of the COVID-19 positive patients had sensorineural type of hearing loss. Across all age groups, there were statistically significant differences in frequencies between the COVID-19 positive patients and the control group. There were no significant differences in distributions of comorbidities between the patients with hearing loss and normal hearing patients. Distribution of unilateral and bilateral hearing loss and audiogram types was also not significantly different between the age groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/complications , Female , Hearing Loss, Bilateral , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
18.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(6)2021 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1282062

ABSTRACT

Since December 2019, when it was first detected in Wuhan, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has spread across the globe. The pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on the global population with >110 million confirmed cases and 2.5 million deaths. The most common initial symptoms of COVID-19 infection are cough, dyspnoea, fever, malaise and anosmia. Severe clinical manifestations include respiratory compromise, pneumonia, organ failure and death. There have been many other less common symptoms as a result of COVID-19 described in the literature, including significant rates of olfactory dysfunction. However, we believe there has been only one other previously documented cases of bilateral hearing loss.Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a relatively common presentation seen by otolaryngologists. It is defined as rapid hearing loss, ≥30 dB occurring over 3 consecutive days in three contiguous sound frequencies. The exact pathological process is yet to be fully characterised, though it is most commonly unilateral and commonly develops shortly following viral infection. Treatment typically consists of glucocorticoid steroids administered orally, via intratympanic injection or a combination of both routes though there are currently no standardised management of these patients.Bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is rare, accounting for <2% of all cases. We describe a case of bilateral SSNHL in a 68-year-old patient who presented with profound hearing loss shortly after symptomatic infection with COVID-19, which at the time of publication is the first such case reported in the literature.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Humans
19.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 35: 20587384211027373, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1277896

ABSTRACT

To describe the audio-vestibular disorders related to the newly SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the possible ototoxicity side-effects related to the use of drugs included in the SARS-CoV-2 treatment protocols. A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA protocol. The Medline and Embase databases were searched from March 1, 2020 to April 9, 2021. Initially the search yielded 400 manuscripts, which were reduced to 15, upon the application of inclusion criteria. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most frequent audio-vestibular symptom described, occurring alone or in association with tinnitus and vertigo. The etiopathogenesis of the inner ear disorders related to COVID-19 infection is still poorly understood. The number of reports of COVID-19 infections associated to audio-vestibular disorders is increasing; even if the quality of the studies available is often insufficient, audio-vestibular disorders should be considered as possible manifestations to be included among the symptoms of this infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Ototoxicity/etiology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Vestibular Diseases/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/virology , Humans , Ototoxicity/virology , Vestibular Diseases/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL